Q. Both 1080p and 46 inch screen size
A. I say Plasma.
Response times and refresh rates are naturally almost instantaneous on Plasmas and they have better viewing angles as well. LCD/LED's have to use more technology to overcome their weaknesses in these areas. By doing so they can suffer from screen lag or blur if their processors aren't up to the task. Screen lag is when images seem to streak across the screen. Control lag can also happen. That's when the image on the screen doesn't respond quickly to your control inputs when you play games. Again the processors have to be up to task to render the image fast enough. And again, Plasma's don't have these problems.
Now a good LED/LCD would keep these issues to a minimum, and most from what I can tell are good, but I just went on and bought a Plasma anyway. I didn't feel like dealing with these issues if they were to come about. Plus, after all this time, LCD/LED's are still trying to play catch up to Plasma's picture. Some people call Plasma's outdated but it's funny how the best 3D TVs are Plasma's.
Yes, they use more energy but they don't seem to use much more than my old CRT and they don't get "hot". They do give off heat that will warm the TV but it's not dangerous to the touch or anything like that.
My 42' LG plasma has been great for my PS3 games, cable watching and Blu-rays. No problems at all.
My advice, get a good plasma and save some money. You really don't need 1080p either if you're not going higher than 42' and are only going to play games most of the time since most games are in 720p. 1080p gets the most out of Blu-ray's if you thinking about playing some later on it.
Response times and refresh rates are naturally almost instantaneous on Plasmas and they have better viewing angles as well. LCD/LED's have to use more technology to overcome their weaknesses in these areas. By doing so they can suffer from screen lag or blur if their processors aren't up to the task. Screen lag is when images seem to streak across the screen. Control lag can also happen. That's when the image on the screen doesn't respond quickly to your control inputs when you play games. Again the processors have to be up to task to render the image fast enough. And again, Plasma's don't have these problems.
Now a good LED/LCD would keep these issues to a minimum, and most from what I can tell are good, but I just went on and bought a Plasma anyway. I didn't feel like dealing with these issues if they were to come about. Plus, after all this time, LCD/LED's are still trying to play catch up to Plasma's picture. Some people call Plasma's outdated but it's funny how the best 3D TVs are Plasma's.
Yes, they use more energy but they don't seem to use much more than my old CRT and they don't get "hot". They do give off heat that will warm the TV but it's not dangerous to the touch or anything like that.
My 42' LG plasma has been great for my PS3 games, cable watching and Blu-rays. No problems at all.
My advice, get a good plasma and save some money. You really don't need 1080p either if you're not going higher than 42' and are only going to play games most of the time since most games are in 720p. 1080p gets the most out of Blu-ray's if you thinking about playing some later on it.
Samsung LCD or Samsung LED-LCD? cant decide between the two, and why/how is one better than the other?
Q. Samsung 46" LCD - http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Samsung+-+46%22+Class+/+1080p+/+240Hz+/+LCD+HDTV/9298431.p?id=1218079342418&skuId=9298431
and
Samsung 46" LED-LCD - http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Samsung+-+46%22+Class+/+1080p+/+120Hz+/+LED-LCD+HDTV/9238835.p?id=1218065985439&skuId=9238835
in these two there's not much in the price difference, but if you have seen an LED-LCD like the one above or an LCD like the one above which would you choose and why? or what are some positive points and negative ones too of each or the type LCD vs. LED?
LCD one does have 150,000:1 contrast ratio
and
Samsung 46" LED-LCD - http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Samsung+-+46%22+Class+/+1080p+/+120Hz+/+LED-LCD+HDTV/9238835.p?id=1218065985439&skuId=9238835
in these two there's not much in the price difference, but if you have seen an LED-LCD like the one above or an LCD like the one above which would you choose and why? or what are some positive points and negative ones too of each or the type LCD vs. LED?
LCD one does have 150,000:1 contrast ratio
A. First of All LED tvs, are not really a new type of tv, instead of using standard cold-cathode fluorescent lights (or CCFLs) to backlight the display, They use Light emitting diodes instead (LEDs) to lite of the display from behind. They have used different approaches to use this LED technology. One way results a quite worse picture, one pretty much looks the same, and another results in probably the best picture you'll ever see on an LCD tv (of course for a very high price). The benefit all LED tvs offer, is the very high energy efficiency.
DEFINITELY choose the LCD version. The Samsung LED-LCD tv on the link you put, Uses an edge lit LED lighting method to create superthin TV, engineers needed to eliminate that extra layer of LEDs and move it to the sides of the display. With this form of backlighting, the LEDs are affixed to all four sides of the TV and light is projected inward to the middle of the TV via "lightguides." This results in an non-uniform overall display (the brightness isn't even distributed properly) (this is said in many review on cnet about tvs using this technology). Plus the LCD version, has a better refresh rate (240hz), reducing blur better during fast moving scenes.
The second type is just a full array of backlit LEDs, instead of a full array of CCFLs. The picture is pretty much the same (super hard to tell a difference). However the third type simply boasts the best picture you'll see on a tv besides plasmas. It features a full array of LEDs, where each one is capable of dynamically dimming itself or turning itself off, depending on whats being displayed on the screen. Creating the darkest black levels on an lcd tv, and great colour reproduction and detail. This is found on the higher end models like the Samsung UN55B8500.
To conclude, the LCD has double the refresh rate, much higher contrast ratio, a full array backlighting method, thats much better than edge lit methods, and double the response time for clearer results during fast moving scenes, and gaming. That LCD you've been looking at is the better choice.
DEFINITELY choose the LCD version. The Samsung LED-LCD tv on the link you put, Uses an edge lit LED lighting method to create superthin TV, engineers needed to eliminate that extra layer of LEDs and move it to the sides of the display. With this form of backlighting, the LEDs are affixed to all four sides of the TV and light is projected inward to the middle of the TV via "lightguides." This results in an non-uniform overall display (the brightness isn't even distributed properly) (this is said in many review on cnet about tvs using this technology). Plus the LCD version, has a better refresh rate (240hz), reducing blur better during fast moving scenes.
The second type is just a full array of backlit LEDs, instead of a full array of CCFLs. The picture is pretty much the same (super hard to tell a difference). However the third type simply boasts the best picture you'll see on a tv besides plasmas. It features a full array of LEDs, where each one is capable of dynamically dimming itself or turning itself off, depending on whats being displayed on the screen. Creating the darkest black levels on an lcd tv, and great colour reproduction and detail. This is found on the higher end models like the Samsung UN55B8500.
To conclude, the LCD has double the refresh rate, much higher contrast ratio, a full array backlighting method, thats much better than edge lit methods, and double the response time for clearer results during fast moving scenes, and gaming. That LCD you've been looking at is the better choice.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar